Privacy
Contact Information
OneMed Group Oy
Metsäläntie 20
FI-00320 Helsinki, Finland
For General Inquiry
For Product Feedback
+46 770 111 115
Recently, in some of our projects, we started employing a risk-based approach. This involves examining the functions of our products to identify where the use of PFAS is suspected. If a product has a function typically associated with intentionally added PFAS, it merits testing. Instead of relying solely on traditional targeted PFAS tests or supplier declarations, we have begun using a new testing protocol developed by RISE (Research Institutes of Sweden) in collaboration with their project partners as part of the POP-free industry project.
Analyzing PFAS in products and the environment is complex due to the diversity of PFAS compounds and their chemical stability. Over 10,000 substances are identified as part of the PFAS family. No single test method can capture them all. Traditional analytical methods focus on a limited set of known PFAS, potentially overlooking other fluorinated substances, especially polymeric and unknown PFAS. Recent advancements highlights the importance of measuring total fluorinated content to gain a more thorough understanding of the total amount of PFAS present.
Methods such as Combustion Ion Chromatography (CIC) and Pyrolysis-GC/MS have emerged as valuable tools. CIC measures total fluorine content, providing an overview of the amount of organic and inorganic fluorinated substances present. Pyrolysis-GC/MS allows for the identification of specific PFAS compounds by analyzing their thermal decomposition products.
As an initial step to verify our approach, we tested all products under our brand, Embra, to ensure they did not contain PFAS. We received feedback that some of the tested products were not relevant for PFAS testing, as they did not have functions typically associated with PFAS use. Going forward, in our new projects, we will focus on testing only those products with an identified risk of containing PFAS based on their functionality.
The testing is performed in two stages using complementary techniques:
Both methods use direct thermal breakdown without any prior extraction steps, effectively capturing polymeric PFAS that might be missed by conventional extraction-based methods.
Using these analytical techniques ensures we can detect a wider range of PFAS compounds, including those not commonly targeted in standard analyses. This approach helps us better understand and manage the potential risks associated with PFAS in our products. Especially polymeric PFAS are common when PFAS is added intentionally to provide a specific function.
By integrating analytical methods and a risk-based approach, we aim to manage PFAS risks in our products, aligning with current scientific best practices and future regulatory expectations. So far, we've applied this approach to a small fraction of our portfolio, but we plan to expand its use in the future to accelerate our journey towards offering a PFAS-free assortment.
| Product | Price | Amount | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Article number:
Brand:
Obsolete
Temporary inactive
Request for Quotation
|
|
|
The product can be replaced by the following produkt
| Product | Price | Amount | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Article number:
Brand:
The product is currently in stock
|
||
We will use your registered email for communication.
You will receive updates about our products.
Warm welcome!
You request is registered. You will now receive news about product updates.
We were unable to find any results.
We were unable to find any results.
We were unable to find any results.
${DeleteUserModalOrganizationsCustomers.customerErpId} - ${DeleteUserModalOrganizationsCustomers.deliveryName}
| Name | |
|---|---|
| ${SelectedCustomer.customerErpId} - ${SelectedCustomer.deliveryName} |
Inactive customers cannot shop
No result